Aim Lab
Schedtool & IRQBalance consideration
AIM Lab with ReactiveTrack Standard task (1 try). It's not 100% revealing of which choice is the best, but only give a brief idea of which could be better. TkG PDS crashed a lot, maybe related to GPU OC (AMD RX 6800XT, Midnight Edition, pushed to 332W > 2600Mhz on core through CoreControl). Since TkG BMQ I switched max power to 289W and seem more stable. Kernel 6.1.8 Xanmod-TT is the one from this AUR Package: linux-xanmod-tt-uksm-cjktty. The notable difference could come from UKSM usage.
Distro: Arch Linux
Kernel: 5.15.54-xanmod1-tt-1.1
GPU Driver: 4.6 Mesa 23.1.0-devel
GPU: Radeon RX 6800/6800 XT / 6900 XT
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core Processor
RAM: 65 GB
Color | Name | 1% Min | Avg | 97th percentile | Avg % vs 5.15 Xanmod-TT / None |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6.2 TkG PDS / None | 230 | 262 | 311 | 110.55 % | |
6.2 TkG PDS / IRQBalance / SchedTool | 227 | 261 | 306 | 110.13 % | |
6.2 TkG BMQ / SchedTool | 229 | 266 | 318 | 112.24 % | |
6.2 TkG BMQ / None | 224 | 266 | 315 | 112.24 % | |
6.2 TkG BMQ / IRQBalance / SchedTool | 234 | 272 | 346 | 114.77 % | |
6.2 TkG BMQ / IRQBalance | 232 | 267 | 322 | 112.66 % | |
6.1 Xanmod-TT / SchedTool | 277 | 315 | 366 | 132.91 % | |
6.1 Xanmod-TT / None | 283 | 321 | 375 | 135.44 % | |
6.1 Xanmod-TT / IRQBalance / SchedTool | 260 | 307 | 370 | 129.54 % | |
6.1 Xanmod-TT / IRQBalance | 259 | 307 | 349 | 129.54 % | |
5.15 Xanmod-TT / SchedTool | 201 | 238 | 301 | 100.42 % | |
5.15 Xanmod-TT / None | 197 | 237 | 296 | 100.0 % | |
5.15 Xanmod-TT / IRQBalance / SchedTool | 216 | 242 | 322 | 102.11 % | |
5.15 Xanmod-TT / IRQBalance | 200 | 237 | 294 | 100.0 % |